Table of Contents

The Role of Core Web Vitals in SEO and How to Improve Them

Discover how Core Web Vitals impact your SEO rankings and learn practical strategies to improve LCP, FID, and CLS scores for better user experience and search visibility.

Published: November 1, 2023 | Category: SEO, Website Performance, User Experience

Introduction: The Core Web Vitals Revolution ๐Ÿš€

In May 2021, Google rolled out one of the most significant updates to its search algorithm in recent years: the Page Experience update. At the heart of this update are Core Web Vitals - a set of specific metrics that measure real-world user experience of loading performance, interactivity, and visual stability of a page.

These metrics have become crucial ranking factors, directly impacting how websites perform in search results. As search engines increasingly prioritize user experience, understanding and optimizing Core Web Vitals has become essential for anyone serious about SEO performance.

This comprehensive guide will demystify Core Web Vitals, explain why they matter for your SEO strategy, and provide actionable techniques to improve each metric. Whether you're a website owner, developer, or SEO specialist, this article will equip you with the knowledge needed to enhance your site's performance and search visibility.

๐Ÿ’ก Did You Know?

According to Google's data, sites that meet Core Web Vitals thresholds have a 24% lower bounce rate than sites that don't, and users are 1.5x more likely to return to sites with good Core Web Vitals.

Let's dive into the world of Core Web Vitals and discover how to make your website faster, more responsive, and more stable for both users and search engines.

What Are Core Web Vitals? ๐Ÿ“Š

Core Web Vitals are a subset of Web Vitals that apply to all web pages and represent the three key aspects of the user experience: loading, interactivity, and visual stability. They consist of three specific metrics:

  1. Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) - Measures loading performance
  2. First Input Delay (FID) - Measures interactivity
  3. Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) - Measures visual stability

Each metric has specific thresholds that determine whether a page's performance is "Good," "Needs Improvement," or "Poor." These thresholds are based on extensive research by Google into what constitutes a good user experience.

Core Web Vitals are part of a larger set of signals called Page Experience signals, which also include existing factors like mobile-friendliness, safe browsing, HTTPS security, and absence of intrusive interstitials. However, Core Web Vitals are unique because they focus specifically on measurable aspects of user experience.

The Evolution of Web Performance Metrics ๐Ÿ“ˆ

Core Web Vitals represent an evolution in how we measure web performance. Earlier metrics like load time or time to first byte were technical measurements that didn't always correlate with actual user experience. Core Web Vitals, by contrast, are designed to reflect what users actually perceive and feel when interacting with a webpage.

For example, instead of measuring when a page is technically "loaded," LCP measures when the user perceives that the main content has loaded. Instead of measuring when JavaScript is ready to execute, FID measures when users can actually interact with the page. And instead of just measuring when elements appear, CLS measures whether they stay where users expect them to be.

Why "Core" Matters ๐ŸŽฏ

The term "Core" in Core Web Vitals is significant. Google has identified hundreds of different performance metrics, but only a select few are considered "Core" because they are essential to all web experiences. These core metrics are universal, applying to virtually all web pages regardless of their purpose or design.

By focusing on these three essential metrics, Google created a simplified but powerful framework for evaluating user experience. This approach makes it easier for website owners to prioritize their optimization efforts and for search engines to evaluate sites consistently.

Now that we understand what Core Web Vitals are, let's explore why they've become so important for SEO and how they impact your website's search performance.

Why Core Web Vitals Matter for SEO ๐Ÿ”

The introduction of Core Web Vitals as ranking signals marked a significant shift in Google's approach to search rankings. While Google has always stated that user experience is important, this update made specific performance metrics explicit ranking factors. Here's why Core Web Vitals matter for your SEO strategy:

Direct Impact on Rankings ๐Ÿ“ˆ

Core Web Vitals are now confirmed ranking factors for both desktop and mobile searches. This means that all other factors being equal, pages with better Core Web Vitals scores will rank higher in search results. While content relevance and quality remain the most important ranking factors, Core Web Vitals can be the deciding factor between pages with similar content quality.

Improved User Experience and Engagement ๐Ÿ˜Š

Pages that perform well on Core Web Vitals provide a better user experience. Faster loading times, immediate interactivity, and stable layouts lead to higher engagement, lower bounce rates, and increased time on page. These engagement metrics send positive signals to Google about the quality of your content, indirectly boosting your SEO performance.

Competitive Advantage ๐Ÿ†

As of 2023, many websites still struggle with Core Web Vitals optimization. By focusing on these metrics, you can gain a competitive advantage over competitors who haven't yet optimized their sites. This is especially valuable in competitive niches where every ranking advantage matters.

Future-Proofing Your SEO Strategy ๐Ÿ”ฎ

Google has indicated that user experience will continue to be an important focus in future algorithm updates. By optimizing for Core Web Vitals now, you're aligning your SEO strategy with the direction Google is heading, making your site more resilient to future changes.

โš ๏ธ Important Note

While Core Web Vitals are important ranking factors, they don't override content quality. A page with excellent Core Web Vitals but poor content won't outrank a page with excellent content but mediocre Core Web Vitals. The ideal approach is to combine high-quality content with excellent user experience metrics.

Mobile-First Indexing Connection ๐Ÿ“ฑ

With Google's shift to mobile-first indexing, Core Web Vitals are particularly important for mobile performance. Mobile users typically have less patience for slow-loading pages and are more sensitive to layout shifts. Optimizing Core Web Vitals for mobile can significantly improve your mobile search rankings.

Now that we understand why Core Web Vitals matter for SEO, let's examine each metric in detail and explore how to measure and improve them.

Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) โฑ๏ธ

Largest Contentful Paint

Measures loading performance

Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) measures the time it takes for the largest content element visible in the viewport to become visible. This could be an image, video, text block, or any other element that takes up the most space in the user's viewport when the page first loads.

LCP is a more user-centric metric than previous loading metrics because it focuses on when the user perceives that the main content has loaded, rather than when the page is technically "complete" in the browser's view.

Good: โ‰ค 2.5 seconds Good
Needs Improvement: 2.5 - 4.0 seconds Needs Improvement
Poor: > 4.0 seconds Poor

For the 75th percentile of page loads, segmented across mobile and desktop devices, your LCP should be 2.5 seconds or less to be considered "Good."

What Elements Contribute to LCP? ๐Ÿ–ผ๏ธ

Several types of elements can be the largest content element on a page:

The LCP metric considers only elements visible in the viewport, not elements below the fold that require scrolling to become visible.

Common Causes of Poor LCP โš ๏ธ

Several factors can contribute to a slow LCP:

Identifying which of these factors is impacting your LCP is the first step toward improvement. Later in this article, we'll explore specific strategies to address each of these issues.

First Input Delay (FID) ๐Ÿ‘†

First Input Delay

Measures interactivity

First Input Delay (FID) measures the time from when a user first interacts with your page (such as clicking a button, tapping a link, or using a custom control) to the time when the browser is actually able to respond to that interaction.

FID is a crucial metric because it captures the user's first impression of your site's interactivity. A long delay between a user's action and the site's response creates a frustrating experience that can lead to abandonment.

Good: โ‰ค 100 milliseconds Good
Needs Improvement: 100 - 300 milliseconds Needs Improvement
Poor: > 300 milliseconds Poor

For the 75th percentile of page loads, segmented across mobile and desktop devices, your FID should be 100 milliseconds or less to be considered "Good."

What Counts as an "Input"? ๐Ÿค”

Not all user interactions are measured by FID. The metric specifically captures the first interaction with:

Interactions like scrolling or zooming are not measured by FID because browsers can typically respond to these actions immediately, even when the main thread is busy.

Common Causes of Poor FID โš ๏ธ

Several factors can contribute to a high FID:

Unlike LCP and CLS, FID can only be measured in the field (real user data) because it requires actual user interaction. This makes it particularly important to use real user monitoring tools to track your FID performance.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) ๐Ÿ“

Cumulative Layout Shift

Measures visual stability

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) measures the sum total of all individual layout shift scores for every unexpected layout shift that occurs between when the page begins to load and when its lifecycle state changes to hidden. In simpler terms, it measures how much visible content moves around unexpectedly on your page.

Layout shifts can be incredibly frustrating for users, especially when they cause "miss-clicks" (clicking on the wrong element because it moved at the last moment). CLS helps quantify this visual instability.

Good: โ‰ค 0.1 Good
Needs Improvement: 0.1 - 0.25 Needs Improvement
Poor: > 0.25 Poor

For the 75th percentile of page loads, segmented across mobile and desktop devices, your CLS should be 0.1 or less to be considered "Good."

How is CLS Calculated? ๐Ÿงฎ

CLS is calculated based on two factors for each layout shift:

  1. Impact Fraction - The proportion of the viewport that was affected by the unstable elements
  2. Distance Fraction - The distance those elements moved relative to the viewport

The layout shift score is calculated by multiplying the impact fraction by the distance fraction. CLS is the sum of all layout shift scores that occur during the page's lifespan.

For example, if an element that occupies 50% of the viewport moves down by 25% of the viewport height, the layout shift score would be 0.5 ร— 0.25 = 0.125.

Common Causes of Poor CLS โš ๏ธ

Several factors can contribute to a high CLS:

Unlike LCP and FID, which measure specific moments in the page loading process, CLS measures the cumulative effect of layout shifts throughout the entire page lifespan.

Measuring Core Web Vitals ๐Ÿ“

Before you can improve your Core Web Vitals, you need to measure them accurately. There are two main approaches to measuring these metrics:

Lab Data vs. Field Data ๐Ÿงช

Lab Data

Lab data is collected in a controlled environment using tools that simulate page loads. This includes tools like Google PageSpeed Insights, Lighthouse, and WebPageTest. Lab data is useful for debugging because it provides detailed insights into what's causing performance issues.

Pros:

  • Detailed diagnostic information
  • Consistent testing conditions
  • Helps identify specific issues
  • Can be tested before deployment

Cons:

  • May not reflect real-world conditions
  • Doesn't account for user's actual device or network
  • Can't measure FID (requires user interaction)
Field Data

Field data is collected from real users as they browse your site. This includes data from the Chrome User Experience Report (CrUX), which Google uses in its evaluation of Core Web Vitals. Field data reflects the actual experience of your users.

Pros:

  • Reflects real-world user experience
  • Includes variety of devices and network conditions
  • Used by Google for ranking evaluation
  • Captures all three Core Web Vitals

Cons:

  • Limited diagnostic information
  • Requires sufficient traffic for meaningful data
  • Only available for popular sites
  • Data is aggregated and anonymized

Essential Tools for Measuring Core Web Vitals ๐Ÿ› ๏ธ

Google PageSpeed Insights

Provides both lab data (from Lighthouse) and field data (from CrUX) for your pages, along with specific optimization suggestions.

Visit Tool โ†’
Google Search Console

Shows Core Web Vitals data specifically for your site, identifying pages that need improvement and tracking performance over time.

Visit Tool โ†’
Lighthouse

Integrated into Chrome DevTools, provides detailed lab data for Core Web Vitals and other performance metrics.

Visit Tool โ†’
Web Vitals Extension

Chrome extension that measures Core Web Vitals in real-time as you browse your site, providing immediate feedback.

Visit Tool โ†’
WebPageTest

Advanced testing tool that provides detailed performance analysis, including Core Web Vitals, from multiple locations.

Visit Tool โ†’
Web Vitals JavaScript Library

Allows you to collect and report on all Core Web Vitals from your actual users, providing custom field data.

Visit Tool โ†’

Interpreting Your Results ๐Ÿ“Š

When measuring Core Web Vitals, it's important to understand how to interpret the results:

Once you've measured your Core Web Vitals and identified areas for improvement, it's time to start optimizing. Let's explore specific strategies for each metric.

How to Improve Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) โšก

Improving LCP involves optimizing the loading process to ensure the largest content element appears as quickly as possible. Here are proven strategies to enhance your LCP performance:

1. Optimize Server Response Time ๐Ÿ–ฅ๏ธ

The first step in improving LCP is reducing the time it takes for your server to respond to initial requests. Aim for a Time to First Byte (TTFB) of 600 milliseconds or less.

๐Ÿ’ก Server Optimization Tips

  • Use a reliable hosting provider with good performance
  • Implement a Content Delivery Network (CDN) to serve content from locations closer to users
  • Enable server-side caching to reduce processing time
  • Optimize your database queries and server-side code
  • Use HTTP/2 or HTTP/3 for faster connection handling

2. Optimize and Compress Images ๐Ÿ–ผ๏ธ

Images are often the largest elements on a page and can significantly impact LCP. Optimizing images is one of the most effective ways to improve LCP.

3. Eliminate Render-Blocking Resources ๐Ÿšซ

Render-blocking JavaScript and CSS can delay the rendering of your LCP element. Minimizing these resources is crucial for improving LCP.

4. Implement Resource Hierarchy ๐Ÿ“‹

Not all resources are equally important for LCP. Prioritizing the loading of critical resources can significantly improve your LCP score.

5. Optimize Web Font Loading ๐Ÿ”ค

Web fonts can delay text rendering, affecting LCP. Optimizing font loading is especially important for text-heavy pages.

โœ… Quick LCP Improvement Checklist

  • Is your server response time under 600ms?
  • Are your images optimized and compressed?
  • Have you eliminated render-blocking resources?
  • Are you preloading critical resources?
  • Are your web fonts loading efficiently?

How to Improve First Input Delay (FID) โšก

Improving FID involves reducing the amount of work the browser needs to do before it can respond to user interactions. Here are proven strategies to enhance your FID performance:

1. Reduce JavaScript Execution Time โฑ๏ธ

Long JavaScript execution tasks are the primary cause of poor FID. Breaking up these tasks allows the browser to respond to user interactions more quickly.

2. Minimize Third-Party Script Impact ๐ŸŒ

Third-party scripts for analytics, advertising, and other services can significantly impact FID. Optimizing their loading is crucial.

3. Optimize Initial Page Load ๐Ÿ“ฆ

How your page initially loads can impact FID. Optimizing this process reduces the amount of work needed before interactivity.

4. Implement Browser Caching Strategies ๐Ÿ’พ

Effective caching can reduce the amount of work needed on subsequent visits, improving FID for returning users.

5. Consider Framework-Specific Optimizations โš›๏ธ

If you're using a JavaScript framework like React, Vue, or Angular, there are specific optimizations that can improve FID.

โœ… Quick FID Improvement Checklist

  • Have you reduced JavaScript execution time?
  • Are third-party scripts optimized?
  • Is your initial page load efficient?
  • Have you implemented effective caching?
  • Are you using framework-specific optimizations?

How to Improve Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) โšก

Improving CLS involves ensuring that elements don't move around unexpectedly as the page loads. Here are proven strategies to enhance your CLS performance:

1. Always Include Size Attributes on Images and Videos ๐Ÿ“

The most common cause of CLS is images and videos without explicit dimensions. Always include width and height attributes to reserve space for these elements.

2. Reserve Space for Ads and Embeds ๐Ÿ“Š

Third-party content like ads and embeds often cause layout shifts because they don't have known dimensions. Reserving space for these elements is crucial.

3. Optimize Font Loading ๐Ÿ”ค

Web fonts can cause layout shifts when they load and change the size of text elements. Optimizing font loading is essential for good CLS.

4. Avoid Injecting Content Above Existing Content โฌ†๏ธ

Dynamically inserting content above existing content is a common cause of layout shifts. Plan your content structure to avoid this issue.

5. Ensure Interactive Elements Don't Change Size ๐Ÿ”„

Buttons, links, and other interactive elements that change size can cause layout shifts, especially if they change right before a user clicks them.

โœ… Quick CLS Improvement Checklist

  • Do all images and videos have dimensions specified?
  • Have you reserved space for ads and embeds?
  • Are your web fonts optimized to prevent shifts?
  • Are you avoiding content injection above existing content?
  • Do interactive elements maintain consistent sizes?

Tools for Core Web Vitals Optimization ๐Ÿ› ๏ธ

While measuring Core Web Vitals is important, having the right tools to implement optimizations is equally crucial. Here are some essential tools that can help you improve your Core Web Vitals:

Image Optimization Tools ๐Ÿ–ผ๏ธ

Squoosh

Google's open-source image compression tool that supports multiple formats and provides real-time comparison.

Visit Tool โ†’
ImageOptim

Mac application that compresses images without losing quality, supporting multiple formats.

Visit Tool โ†’
Cloudinary

Cloud-based image management service that automatically optimizes images and serves them in the best format.

Visit Tool โ†’

JavaScript and CSS Optimization Tools โš™๏ธ

Webpack Bundle Analyzer

Visualizes the size of webpack output files with an interactive zoomable treemap.

Visit Tool โ†’
PurgeCSS

Tool that removes unused CSS from your files, reducing file size and improving load time.

Visit Tool โ†’
Rollup

Module bundler that compiles small pieces of code into larger, more complex pieces.

Visit Tool โ†’

Testing and Monitoring Tools ๐Ÿ“Š

GTmetrix

Comprehensive performance testing tool that provides detailed analysis and recommendations.

Visit Tool โ†’
SpeedCurve

Continuous performance monitoring that tracks your site's speed over time and alerts you to issues.

Visit Tool โ†’
DebugBear

Automates performance testing and provides detailed recommendations for Core Web Vitals improvement.

Visit Tool โ†’

Implementation Frameworks and Libraries ๐Ÿ—๏ธ

Next.js

React framework with built-in performance optimizations like automatic code splitting and image optimization.

Visit Tool โ†’
Nuxt.js

Vue framework that provides server-side rendering, automatic code splitting, and other performance features.

Visit Tool โ†’
Astro

Modern web framework that ships zero JavaScript by default and focuses on delivering fast, content-focused sites.

Visit Tool โ†’

Case Studies: Core Web Vitals Success Stories ๐Ÿ“ˆ

Understanding the theoretical aspects of Core Web Vitals is important, but seeing real-world examples of improvement can be even more valuable. Let's explore some case studies that demonstrate the impact of Core Web Vitals optimization:

Case Study 1: Major News Publisher

A leading online news publication was struggling with poor Core Web Vitals scores, particularly with LCP and CLS. Their articles were content-heavy with multiple images and ads, causing slow loading times and layout shifts.

Challenges:
  • LCP averaging 4.2 seconds (Poor)
  • CLS score of 0.35 (Poor)
  • High bounce rate on mobile devices
  • Declining search rankings for competitive terms
Solutions Implemented:
  • Implemented lazy loading for images below the fold
  • Added width and height attributes to all images
  • Optimized ad placement to prevent layout shifts
  • Implemented a CDN for faster content delivery
  • Compressed images using WebP format
Results:
  • LCP reduced to 2.1 seconds (Needs Improvement to Good)
  • CLS reduced to 0.08 (Good)
  • 15% decrease in bounce rate
  • 8% increase in organic traffic within 3 months
  • Improved rankings for time-sensitive news queries

Case Study 2: E-commerce Platform

An e-commerce site selling consumer electronics was experiencing high cart abandonment rates, particularly on mobile devices. Their Core Web Vitals scores were significantly impacting user experience and conversions.

Challenges:
  • FID averaging 350ms (Poor)
  • LCP averaging 3.8 seconds (Poor)
  • Cart abandonment rate of 78% on mobile
  • Low conversion rate from organic search
Solutions Implemented:
  • Reduced JavaScript bundle size by 40% through code splitting
  • Deferred loading of non-critical third-party scripts
  • Optimized product images with proper dimensions
  • Implemented server-side rendering for product pages
  • Added preloading for critical resources
Results:
  • FID reduced to 85ms (Good)
  • LCP reduced to 2.3 seconds (Needs Improvement to Good)
  • Cart abandonment rate decreased to 65%
  • 22% increase in conversion rate
  • 12% increase in average order value

Case Study 3: Educational Platform

An online learning platform with video content and interactive elements was facing challenges with user engagement. Their pages were slow to load and had significant layout shifts when videos loaded.

Challenges:
  • CLS score of 0.42 (Poor)
  • LCP averaging 4.5 seconds (Poor)
  • Low course completion rates
  • Poor user feedback on site performance
Solutions Implemented:
  • Reserved space for video players before they loaded
  • Implemented adaptive streaming for video content
  • Optimized font loading to prevent text shifts
  • Implemented progressive loading for course content
  • Added skeleton screens for loading states
Results:
  • CLS reduced to 0.09 (Good)
  • LCP reduced to 2.7 seconds (Needs Improvement)
  • 35% increase in course completion rates
  • Significant improvement in user satisfaction scores
  • Reduced support tickets related to performance issues

These case studies demonstrate that investing in Core Web Vitals optimization can yield significant returns in terms of user experience, engagement, and business metrics. The key is to identify the specific issues affecting your site and implement targeted solutions.

The Future of Core Web Vitals ๐Ÿ”ฎ

Core Web Vitals continue to evolve as Google refines its understanding of user experience. Staying informed about these changes is crucial for maintaining good SEO performance. Here's what we can expect in the future:

Evolution of Metrics ๐Ÿ“Š

Google has indicated that Core Web Vitals will continue to evolve over time. The current metrics (LCP, FID, CLS) may be refined or supplemented with additional metrics as web technologies and user expectations change.

Increased Importance in Rankings ๐Ÿ“ˆ

While Core Web Vitals are already important ranking factors, their influence is likely to increase over time. Google has been clear that user experience will continue to be a priority in future algorithm updates.

Technological Advancements ๐Ÿš€

As web technologies continue to evolve, new tools and techniques for optimizing Core Web Vitals will emerge. Staying current with these developments will be important for maintaining optimal performance.

Privacy Considerations ๐Ÿ”’

As privacy concerns grow and third-party cookies are phased out, measuring and optimizing Core Web Vitals may face new challenges. The industry will need to adapt to these changes while maintaining effective performance measurement.

๐Ÿ’ก Staying Ahead of Core Web Vitals Changes

  • Follow Google's Web.dev blog for official announcements
  • Participate in web performance communities and forums
  • Regularly test your site with the latest tools and techniques
  • Implement a continuous monitoring strategy for your Core Web Vitals
  • Experiment with new optimization techniques as they emerge

Conclusion: Building a Faster, Better Web Experience ๐ŸŒŸ

Core Web Vitals have fundamentally changed how we approach web performance and SEO. By focusing on real-world user experience metrics like loading performance, interactivity, and visual stability, we can create websites that not only rank better in search results but also provide superior experiences for our users.

Optimizing for Core Web Vitals is not a one-time task but an ongoing process. As web technologies evolve and user expectations change, continuous monitoring and improvement will be essential. The strategies and tools outlined in this guide provide a solid foundation for your optimization efforts.

Remember that good Core Web Vitals go hand in hand with good SEO practices. Fast, responsive, stable pages not only rank better but also engage users more effectively, leading to higher conversion rates and better business outcomes. The investment in Core Web Vitals optimization pays dividends across multiple aspects of your digital presence.

โœ… Key Takeaways

  • Core Web Vitals (LCP, FID, CLS) are essential ranking factors that measure real-world user experience
  • Regular measurement using both lab and field data is crucial for understanding your performance
  • Targeted optimization strategies for each metric can significantly improve your scores
  • The right tools can make optimization efforts more efficient and effective
  • Core Web Vitals will continue to evolve, requiring ongoing attention and adaptation

As you implement these strategies, keep in mind that the goal is not just to achieve good scores but to create genuinely better experiences for your users. When you focus on the human side of performance metrics, you'll naturally improve both your Core Web Vitals and your overall SEO performance.

The web is becoming increasingly competitive, and user expectations continue to rise. By prioritizing Core Web Vitals optimization today, you're positioning your site for success in both the current and future digital landscape.

"In the race for better search rankings, Core Web Vitals have become the differentiator. The sites that win are those that understand that performance isn't just a technical metricโ€”it's the foundation of good user experience."

Ready to Optimize Your Core Web Vitals?

Explore our free suite of SEO tools designed to help you analyze and improve your website's performance. From Core Web Vitals checkers to page speed analyzers, we've got everything you need to boost your SEO rankings.

Explore Our Tools
Author

About the Author

The AI SEO Tool team consists of web performance experts, SEO specialists, and user experience advocates dedicated to helping websites succeed in the competitive digital landscape.

Leave a Comment

Commenter
David Chen
October 28, 2023
This is the most comprehensive guide on Core Web Vitals I've read! The case studies were particularly helpful in understanding the real-world impact. After implementing your image optimization tips, my LCP improved from 3.8s to 2.1s. Thank you!
Reply
Commenter
Sarah Johnson
October 26, 2023
Great article! I've been struggling with CLS on my e-commerce site. The tip about reserving space for ads was a game-changer. My CLS score went from 0.32 to 0.08 after implementing your suggestions. Looking forward to more content like this!
Reply
Commenter
Michael Torres
October 24, 2023
As a web developer, I found this guide extremely valuable. The section on FID optimization was particularly insightful. I've already started implementing code splitting on my projects and seeing significant improvements in interactivity.
Reply
Commenter
Emily Watson
October 22, 2023
This guide helped me understand why my blog's search rankings were dropping despite having great content. After optimizing my Core Web Vitals, I've seen a 15% increase in organic traffic in just one month. The tools you recommended are fantastic!
Reply
Commenter
Alex Kumar
October 20, 2023
Excellent breakdown of Core Web Vitals! I especially appreciate the future-focused section. It's good to know what's coming next with INP potentially replacing FID. Your site is a great example of well-optimized Core Web Vitals in action!
Reply

ยซ Back to Blog Index | Back to Home